加拿大P島的島民David Weale, 在2018.4.4 就提出GWBI(妙音佛學院)的購地,有少報的嫌疑-即GWBI的發言人Floyd Sanderson說 “GWBI只有47英畝的建地”,但David 認為”不只這個數字- 即他提出是107.5英畝[也不是2017.9.30說的225英畝了].金女最後會再如何”巧奪土地”,希望David可以在P島好好的看著吧! p島的寺院,多建成觀光的度假勝地,這是要安頓僧尼修學嗎?
2018.7.9
2018.7.9
加拿大P島的島民David Weale, 在2018.4.4 就提出GWBI(妙音佛學院)的購地,有少報的嫌疑
即GWBI的發言人Floyd Sanderson說 “GWBI只有47英畝的建地”,但David 認為”不只這個數字- 即他提出是107.5英畝”
即GWBI的發言人Floyd Sanderson說 “GWBI只有47英畝的建地”,但David 認為”不只這個數字- 即他提出是107.5英畝”
然就 "衛報" 的Dave Stewart (dave.stewart@theguardian.pe.ca)
Published: Jan 05, 2017 at midnight [2017.1.5 公佈]
Updated: Sep 30, 2017 at 3:16 a.m. [2017.9.30 更正]
提到
Published: Jan 05, 2017 at midnight [2017.1.5 公佈]
Updated: Sep 30, 2017 at 3:16 a.m. [2017.9.30 更正]
提到
A new monastery site is set for the
Buddhist nuns is also in the works although plans have not been finalized yet.
The monastery will be built on the farm sold to GWBI by Willy and Jenny Delodder. The property is located on the Brudenell Point Road (which corrects information The Guardian previously published) and is 225 acres with a partial water view.
The waterfront lots are owned by both residents and non-residents.
[譯文]雖然計劃尚未最終確定，但佛教尼眾們正在建設一個新的寺院。尼寺院將建在Willy和Jenny Delodder出售給GWBI的農場上。該物業位於Brudenell Point Road（更正The Guardian之前發布的信息），佔地225英畝，享有部分水景。 海濱地段由居民和非居民擁有。
[1英亩=1224.1741136825坪/225英畝=275300坪(27.5萬坪)/94甲- [PS:請幫忙再確定這些數字]
The monastery will be built on the farm sold to GWBI by Willy and Jenny Delodder. The property is located on the Brudenell Point Road (which corrects information The Guardian previously published) and is 225 acres with a partial water view.
The waterfront lots are owned by both residents and non-residents.
[譯文]雖然計劃尚未最終確定，但佛教尼眾們正在建設一個新的寺院。尼寺院將建在Willy和Jenny Delodder出售給GWBI的農場上。該物業位於Brudenell Point Road（更正The Guardian之前發布的信息），佔地225英畝，享有部分水景。 海濱地段由居民和非居民擁有。
[1英亩=1224.1741136825坪/225英畝=275300坪(27.5萬坪)/94甲- [PS:請幫忙再確定這些數字]
@....>也就是2017.9.30. 大覺或妙音佛學院的發言人Floyd Sanderson,提到GWBI的建地是225英畝,
但2018.4.4 Floyd 又減為47英畝,
以2018.4.4 David在臉書上,是指出GWBI(妙音佛學院)實際的建地是107.5英畝 (不是47英畝, 當然也不是2017.9.30說的225英畝了)
但2018.4.4 Floyd 又減為47英畝,
以2018.4.4 David在臉書上,是指出GWBI(妙音佛學院)實際的建地是107.5英畝 (不是47英畝, 當然也不是2017.9.30說的225英畝了)
總之, 狡猾的金女核心團, 最後會怎樣的再”巧奪土地”或”何將台灣的善款洗過去”-這應該都還會有很多變化! 因此,希望David可以在P島好好的看著吧!
*其實從David的發文中,特別感覺,P島的島民已經對金女一直用福僧的名義建寺院或一直擴建,感覺不對勁與開始嚴重的提出異議,
故金女核心團,這時想到可利用尼師的名義買地與擴建-
即金女等,現在會要 ”在2012年去P島U地開墾的尼團”, 轉移到B地,擴大的建尼寺.
故金女核心團,這時想到可利用尼師的名義買地與擴建-
即金女等,現在會要 ”在2012年去P島U地開墾的尼團”, 轉移到B地,擴大的建尼寺.
問題是金女真是為了安頓僧尼,才這樣擴建,還是要假借名目的好揩油呢?
以p島的寺院,多建成觀光的度假勝地, 這是要安頓僧尼修學嗎? 還是金女感覺台灣的福智呆胞還是可以榨取,故會要尼師,繼續擴建-如是金女就方便撈錢呢?
以p島的寺院,多建成觀光的度假勝地, 這是要安頓僧尼修學嗎? 還是金女感覺台灣的福智呆胞還是可以榨取,故會要尼師,繼續擴建-如是金女就方便撈錢呢?
因為南海尼寺,怎麼想,都沒有理由需到P島建寺啊-以她們又不能跟金女住或親近, 如是只要請格西或學成的福僧,到台灣尼寺教尼師,不就好了.
希望可以反應給尼團的法友,對她們提出,或就是抵制的”不要再幫福智僧尼在加拿大建寺”吧!
----------------------------------
http://chimei0378.blogspot.com/…/30gebis-2012-2014-2012-201…
2018.4.6
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10215858285310437&id=1244672728
----------------------------------
http://chimei0378.blogspot.com/…/30gebis-2012-2014-2012-201…
2018.4.6
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10215858285310437&id=1244672728
David Weale 2018.4月4日 6:07 ·
THE VIEW FROM THIS BRANCH
Buddhist Circumventions
According to Floyd Sanderson, spokesperson for the Buddhists, the Great Wisdom Buddhist Inst. (GWBI) recently purchased 47 acres in Brudenell for the construction of a monastery for Buddhist nuns. He also went on to say that the group is well within the land acreage they are permitted to own.
[譯文]從這個分支看
佛教規避
據佛教徒發言人弗洛伊德桑德森說，妙音佛學院(GWBI）最近在Brudenell購買了47英畝的土地,修建佛教尼師修道院。
他還說，該集團[GWBI]是在他們被允許擁有的土地面積範圍內。
THE VIEW FROM THIS BRANCH
Buddhist Circumventions
According to Floyd Sanderson, spokesperson for the Buddhists, the Great Wisdom Buddhist Inst. (GWBI) recently purchased 47 acres in Brudenell for the construction of a monastery for Buddhist nuns. He also went on to say that the group is well within the land acreage they are permitted to own.
[譯文]從這個分支看
佛教規避
據佛教徒發言人弗洛伊德桑德森說，妙音佛學院(GWBI）最近在Brudenell購買了47英畝的土地,修建佛教尼師修道院。
他還說，該集團[GWBI]是在他們被允許擁有的土地面積範圍內。
The story in today’s Guardian clearly
leaves the impression that the
Buddhists have only the acreage Sanderson mentioned, but knowing that was not the case I decided to do a little checking. With the help of a friend I was able to determine that the organization in question owns more than ten times the land mentioned, and there are several other properties in the vicinity owned by individuals with indisputable ties to GWBI.
[Anyone wishing to affirm this should check out these additional properties owned by GWBI: parcel #1026228, 65.4 acres, and parcel #711382,42.1 acres].
[譯文] 今天衛報的故事 顯然讓人覺得佛教徒 只有桑德森提到的種植面積，但知道情況並非如此，我決定做一些檢查。 在朋友的幫助下，我能夠確定所涉及的組織 擁有十倍以上的土地，並且附近還有其他幾個與GWBI有著無可爭議的關係的房產。
[任何人希望證實這一點應該檢查GWBI擁有的這些附加屬性：
包裹＃1026228，65.4英畝 和
包裹＃711382 , 42.1英畝]。
Buddhists have only the acreage Sanderson mentioned, but knowing that was not the case I decided to do a little checking. With the help of a friend I was able to determine that the organization in question owns more than ten times the land mentioned, and there are several other properties in the vicinity owned by individuals with indisputable ties to GWBI.
[Anyone wishing to affirm this should check out these additional properties owned by GWBI: parcel #1026228, 65.4 acres, and parcel #711382,42.1 acres].
[譯文] 今天衛報的故事 顯然讓人覺得佛教徒 只有桑德森提到的種植面積，但知道情況並非如此，我決定做一些檢查。 在朋友的幫助下，我能夠確定所涉及的組織 擁有十倍以上的土地，並且附近還有其他幾個與GWBI有著無可爭議的關係的房產。
[任何人希望證實這一點應該檢查GWBI擁有的這些附加屬性：
包裹＃1026228，65.4英畝 和
包裹＃711382 , 42.1英畝]。
@.....>妙音佛學院實際上是擁有107.5英畝的土地,卻要謊稱47英畝,不知這些已經出家的尼師現在是怎麼想的,即佛會允許她們這樣的謊稱嗎? 還是尼師認為她們是為了滿師長金女的願望-有一個金女可以建立教法的基地 (邪教基地) 故是可以這樣的對外說謊呢?
Unless there is information of which I
am not aware I would have to say that the story was an attempt to mislead
Islanders, which doesn’t surprise me since the use of loopholes to get around
the Lands Protection Act has been a strategy the monks have been using for
years; loopholes like having land purchased by affiliated organizations and
individuals.
They do it because they can, and my greatest beef is not with the Buddhists, but with two successive Liberal Governments that have failed utterly to insure the spirit of the Lands Protection Act is honoured.
I regard them as traitors.
[譯文] 除非有我不知道的信息，否則我不得不說這個故事 是一種企圖誤導島民的做法，這並不讓我感到意外，因為利用漏洞繞過“土地保護法”是一種僧侶們的策略,多年來一直在使用-像附屬組織和個人購買土地這樣的漏洞。
他們這樣做是因為他們可以，而我最大的牛肉不是佛教徒，而是連續兩屆自由政府完全失敗，以確保土地保護法令的精神 得到尊重。
我把他們視為叛徒。
They do it because they can, and my greatest beef is not with the Buddhists, but with two successive Liberal Governments that have failed utterly to insure the spirit of the Lands Protection Act is honoured.
I regard them as traitors.
[譯文] 除非有我不知道的信息，否則我不得不說這個故事 是一種企圖誤導島民的做法，這並不讓我感到意外，因為利用漏洞繞過“土地保護法”是一種僧侶們的策略,多年來一直在使用-像附屬組織和個人購買土地這樣的漏洞。
他們這樣做是因為他們可以，而我最大的牛肉不是佛教徒，而是連續兩屆自由政府完全失敗，以確保土地保護法令的精神 得到尊重。
我把他們視為叛徒。
沒有留言:
張貼留言